My wife and I have reached the point where we’ve known each
other longer than we’ve not known
each other. I think it’s a significant
milestone in our relationship, and no small feat, at least on her part. While I got myself a normal wife,
unfortunately, she got herself an engineer.
It does have its upsides, to be sure. However, there are also a myriad of peculiarities
that come as part of the package. Does
the career choice dictate the behavior, or does the behavior influence the
career choice? I don’t know. But I do know that what she puts up with is
almost universal to my kind. I found an
incredibly detailed list on these traits and made a few modifications to
it. So, by way of explanation, and in honor of Labor Day, here are
some of the trials associated with my job that she’s had to endure over the years:
Social Skills
Granted, she’s done a great job in training this out of me,
but engineers have entirely different objectives when it comes to social
interaction. “Normal” people expect to
accomplish several unrealistic things from socializing like:
·
Having stimulating and thought-provoking
conversation
·
Creating important social contacts
·
Feeling connectedness with other human beings
In contrast to “normal” people, engineers tend to have more
rational objectives when it comes to social interactions:
·
Demonstrate mental superiority and mastery of
all subjects
·
Avoid getting invited to something unpleasant
·
Get it over with as quickly as possible
Fascination With Gadgets
To the engineer, all matter in the universe can be placed
firmly into one of two categories:
1. Things
that need to be fixed
2. Things
that will need to be fixed after I’ve had a few minutes to mess with them
At their very core, engineers are problem solvers. They love it so much that if there are no
problems handily available, they will create their own problems. Normal people, for the most part, don’t
understand this concept; they believe that if it ain’t broke, don’t fix
it. Engineers believe that if it ain’t
broke, it probably doesn’t have enough features yet.
No engineer looks at a television remote control without
wondering what it would take to add a tazer function. To us, the world is a toy box full of
sub-optimized and feature-poor toys.
Fashion and Appearance
This pains me to write, but without the encouragement of a
loving wife or girlfriend, clothes are the lowest priority for an engineer. Assuming the basic threshold for temperature
and decency has been satisfied, the objective of clothing has been met. Anything else is a waste.
Love of Star Trek
Engineers love all of the “Star Trek” television shows and
movies. It’s a small wonder, since the
engineers on the starship Enterprise are portrayed as heroes exploring the secrets
of the universe. This is much more
glamorous than the real life of an engineer, which consists mostly of hiding
from the universe.
Dating and Marriage
Dating is never easy for engineers. A normal person will employ various indirect
and duplicitous methods to create a false impression of attractiveness. Engineers are largely incapable of placing
appearance above function. Fortunately,
engineers have an ace in the hole. They
are widely recognized as superior marriage material: intelligent, dependable, employed, honest,
and somewhat handy around the house.
Honesty
Engineers are always honest in matters of technology and
human relationships. It’s for this very
reason that it’s best to keep them away from customers, romantic interests, and
other people who can’t handle the truth.
It is this strident vain of honesty that can make watching
movies with engineers an excruciating experience. Not only will they spend the entire film
analyzing the true capabilities or presentation of all technical matters on the
big screen, they’ll see fit to share it with those present.
Frugality
Engineers are notoriously frugal. This is not because of cheapness or mean
spirit; it is simply because every spending situation is seen as a problem in
optimization, that is, “How can I escape this situation while retaining the
greatest amount of cash?”
Powers of Concentration
If there is one trait that best defines an engineer, it is
the ability to concentrate on one subject to the complete exclusion of
everything else. This, on occasion,
causes them to be pronounced dead prematurely.
Some funeral homes in high-tech areas have started checking resumes
before processing the bodies. Anyone
with a degree in electrical engineering or experience in computer programming
is propped up in the lounge for a few days just to see if they “snap out of
it.”
Risk
Engineers hate risk.
They will eliminate it at every possible turn. This is understandable, given that when an
engineer makes one little mistake, the media will treat it like it’s a big deal
(i.e. Hindenburg, Space Shuttle Challenger, Titanic, Ford Pinto).
The risk/reward calculation for engineers looks something
like this:
RISK: Public humiliation and the death of thousands
of innocent people.
REWARD: A certificate
of appreciation in a handsome plastic frame.
Being practical people, engineers evaluate this balance of
risks and rewards and decide that risk is not a good thing. The best way to avoid risk is by advising that
any activity is technically impossible for reasons that are far too complicated
to explain. If that is not sufficient to
halt a project, then the engineer will fall back to a second line of
defense: “It’s technically possible but
it will cost too much.”
Ego
Ego-wise, the most important thing to an engineer is how
smart they are. The fastest way to get
an engineer to solve a problem is to declare that the problem is
unsolvable. No engineer can walk away
from an unsolvable problem. No illness
or distraction is sufficient to get them off the case. These types of challenges quickly become
personal – a battle between the engineer and the laws of nature.
Along those lines, nothing is more threatening to the engineer
than the suggestion that somebody has more technical skill. Sometimes, less scrupulous people (managers)
will use that knowledge as a lever to extract more work from the engineer. For instance, an engineer might say that a
project is technically impossible to complete (code for “I don’t want to do
it”), and a manager would respond by saying, “I’ll have Bob look into it. He’s good at solving difficult problems.”